<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ligatures in Mac OS X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/</link>
	<description>Wildbit builds subscriber-based services and social software for the web. We focus on innovation and effective interface design to drive results.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: simon kayt</title>
		<link>http://www.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>simon kayt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>I would like to use the common ligatures of Oe as in Oedipus or oedema. or ae as in aedis christi in word for mac or windows: can anyone ofm you brainy typography experts tell me how to do that?  thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to use the common ligatures of Oe as in Oedipus or oedema. or ae as in aedis christi in word for mac or windows: can anyone ofm you brainy typography experts tell me how to do that?  thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheNetAvenger</title>
		<link>http://www.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>TheNetAvenger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-64</guid>
		<description>Ok, I am a graphic designer and yes this is really nice.

However, it is not so amazing. Show me an 'Q' with a Tail that wraps back over the word, and then you will get me to go wow, 'real' ligature support. OSX's ligature support is barely beyond kerning offsets.

In comparison, Windows 2000 even supported these basic Ligatures, like OSX does. Let's demand a bit more from OSX and Apple, they need to give us ligature support like in Microsoft added in Windows Vista, which can do the flowing tails and has extensive 'dramatic' ligature font support throughout the OS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I am a graphic designer and yes this is really nice.</p>
<p>However, it is not so amazing. Show me an &#8216;Q&#8217; with a Tail that wraps back over the word, and then you will get me to go wow, &#8216;real&#8217; ligature support. OSX&#8217;s ligature support is barely beyond kerning offsets.</p>
<p>In comparison, Windows 2000 even supported these basic Ligatures, like OSX does. Let&#8217;s demand a bit more from OSX and Apple, they need to give us ligature support like in Microsoft added in Windows Vista, which can do the flowing tails and has extensive &#8216;dramatic&#8217; ligature font support throughout the OS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I noticed this while typing the other day. The only one I could find was ff though, and I didn't know it was called a ligature. It's nice to know Apple put these little touches in the Operating System, and that people notice and appreciate them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I noticed this while typing the other day. The only one I could find was ff though, and I didn&#8217;t know it was called a ligature. It&#8217;s nice to know Apple put these little touches in the Operating System, and that people notice and appreciate them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamal Mubarak</title>
		<link>http://www.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamal Mubarak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-50</guid>
		<description>I should add that it changes from font to font.  Try in TextEdit with Times and Times Roman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that it changes from font to font.  Try in TextEdit with Times and Times Roman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kamal Mubarak</title>
		<link>http://www.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Kamal Mubarak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Not always good.  Try typing liters per minute as l/min and see what ligatures can do!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not always good.  Try typing liters per minute as l/min and see what ligatures can do!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>By default ligatures will be automatically used if the font supports them.  There is no problem with a spell checker, indexing, etc. because ligatures only affect the APPEARANCE of the word and not the actual letters that make up the word.  You can experiment in TextEdit by using the Format-&gt;Font-&gt;Ligature menu to turn ligatures on and off in a font like Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By default ligatures will be automatically used if the font supports them.  There is no problem with a spell checker, indexing, etc. because ligatures only affect the APPEARANCE of the word and not the actual letters that make up the word.  You can experiment in TextEdit by using the Format->Font->Ligature menu to turn ligatures on and off in a font like Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://www.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Well, when I'm writing "efficient" in this comment field I see ligature. Not every font have ligatures, so it's fine that you don't see them sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, when I&#8217;m writing &#8220;efficient&#8221; in this comment field I see ligature. Not every font have ligatures, so it&#8217;s fine that you don&#8217;t see them sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walt French</title>
		<link>http://www.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Walt French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.wildbit.com/blog/2007/01/22/ligatures-in-mac-os-x/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Big whoop that the menus look nice. How about making the USER more capable? 

Howzabout when I type "efficient" (or another word that looks awful in most typefaces, e.g., Times) in a document, that the ligatures, if they exist in that typeface, be automatically displayed? ... And that the spellchecker doesn't choke on the goofball "spelling," that indexing still works, ... Otherwise, this is a tiny piece of eye candy with most results just as bad as MS Word under windows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big whoop that the menus look nice. How about making the USER more capable? </p>
<p>Howzabout when I type &#8220;efficient&#8221; (or another word that looks awful in most typefaces, e.g., Times) in a document, that the ligatures, if they exist in that typeface, be automatically displayed? &#8230; And that the spellchecker doesn&#8217;t choke on the goofball &#8220;spelling,&#8221; that indexing still works, &#8230; Otherwise, this is a tiny piece of eye candy with most results just as bad as MS Word under windows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
